Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: SIP over TCP

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,220

    Default Re: SIP over TCP

    I believe TCP has too much overhead for practical real-time conversation - or at least that was true as VoIP was developed.
    It used to be code had to be small because memory and processing power was limited. Now code can be ponderous, but
    fast to build the app. Still, I don't think voice technology is ready for bloat.


    Using VOIPo services since February 2007
    Beta Tested the VOIPo Reseller Plan.
    A happy VOIPo Residential Customer

    Using VoIP devices since 12-2002
    Companies I've tried
    iConnectHere|Vonage|BroadvoxDirect|Vonage|Packet8| VOIPo
    VOIPo is a keeper!


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    27

    Default Re: SIP over TCP

    Quote Originally Posted by usa2k View Post
    I believe TCP has too much overhead for practical real-time conversation - or at least that was true as VoIP was developed.
    It used to be code had to be small because memory and processing power was limited. Now code can be ponderous, but
    fast to build the app. Still, I don't think voice technology is ready for bloat.
    Well TCP would be just for signalling, not RTP. SCCP/SKINNY uses only TCP or TLS for signalling never supported UDP, as far as I know.

    TCP could be an advantage esp over wireless networks, not counting 802.11, since the invite could be lost esp in a ring group scenario.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •