Results 1 to 10 of 57

Thread: PAP2T vs RT31P2

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Re: PAP2T vs RT31P2

    Quote Originally Posted by ctaranto View Post
    I have two laptops. One is running XP, but only has wireless (no driver for the internal wired port). The other is running Ubuntu. It's set up for DHCP (and works fine at work).

    /c
    Let's first forget about the liunx machine, focus on the XP one. Just connect the XP one to RT. then run the ipconfig /all.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    166

    Default Re: PAP2T vs RT31P2

    Quote Originally Posted by voip123 View Post
    Let's first forget about the liunx machine, focus on the XP one. Just connect the XP one to RT. then run the ipconfig /all.
    The RT, not being wireless, can't be connected to it. There isn't a driver for the wired port on the laptop. The other (3rd) laptop is booted. Trying now...

    /c

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    166

    Default Re: PAP2T vs RT31P2

    The XP laptop isn't getting an IP, either.

    ipconfig /all shows

    dhcp enabled: Yes
    autoconfiguration enabled: Yes
    IP Address: 0.0.0.0
    Subnet: 0.0.0.0
    Default gateway: <blank>
    DHCP Server: 255.255.255.255

    /c

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    166

    Default Re: PAP2T vs RT31P2

    Found the problem. I had turned NAT off in my experiment with the "vonage" setup I posted earlier. I turned it back on, and now DHCP works.

    The laptop hardwired to the RT can now see the internet.

    Now, to get Phone 1 lit up...

    /c

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    166

    Default Re: PAP2T vs RT31P2

    Do I forward ports from the WRT to the 192 or 172 address?

    /c

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    513

    Default Re: PAP2T vs RT31P2

    Quote Originally Posted by ctaranto View Post
    Do I forward ports from the WRT to the 192 or 172 address?

    /c
    If you need to forward ports you'd you'll be forwarding from the WRT to whatever address the WRT has assigned the RT (i.e. the RT's WAN address). Also see my previous post.
    Russell

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    166

    Default Re: PAP2T vs RT31P2

    Quote Originally Posted by Russell View Post
    If you need to forward ports you'd you'll be forwarding from the WRT to whatever address the WRT has assigned the RT (i.e. the RT's WAN address). Also see my previous post.
    Under voip123's recommendation, I statically set the WAN side of the RT to 172.20.0.118, so I forwarded that IP in the WRT.

    I still don't have Phone 1 lit up. I filed a support ticket last night about this but haven't heard back. Maybe support doesn't work on the weekends?

    Thanks again...

    -Craig

  8. #8

    Default Re: PAP2T vs RT31P2

    Quote Originally Posted by ctaranto View Post
    Found the problem. I had turned NAT off in my experiment with the "vonage" setup I posted earlier. I turned it back on, and now DHCP works.

    The laptop hardwired to the RT can now see the internet.

    Now, to get Phone 1 lit up...

    /c
    Glad you make it work.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    MA
    Posts
    166

    Default Re: PAP2T vs RT31P2

    Quote Originally Posted by voip123 View Post
    Glad you make it work.
    Thanks for all the help. You guys are great.

    /c

  10. #10

    Default Re: PAP2T vs RT31P2

    Quote Originally Posted by ctaranto View Post
    the rt, not being wireless, can't be connected to it. There isn't a driver for the wired port on the laptop. The other (3rd) laptop is booted. Trying now...

    /c
    you must use cable to connect laptop and rt

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •