Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Outgoing CID

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Central Cali :)
    Posts
    553

    Default Outgoing CID

    I've noticed that recently my OB CID changed from 'Fresno CA 559272XXXX' to 'Private Name Private Number'. I imagine some of my outgoing calls are being blocked by those who do not accept calls from 'privates'. Any chance it will be changed back soon ? And how bout having it show my name ?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    801

    Default Re: Outgoing CID

    I don't recall seeing this feature in the vPanel, but will there be an option to block outgoing CID per line? Does *67 work per call? If per line blocking is an option (and enabled), is there a code to force display of the number (*82)?

    EDIT: I'm not terribly worried about having/not having this feature, but it may be an issue for some customers who are used to having it with POTS. Also, FWIW, my number is transmitted just fine--last I knew, the name transmitted was "NC Caller" but I haven't used my voipo line to call a phone with CNAM display in a while.
    Last edited by fisamo; 10-28-2008 at 02:49 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Central Cali :)
    Posts
    553

    Default Re: Outgoing CID

    I don't have any CID blocking on, and I'm calling from one voipo line to another which has always shown 'Fresno, CA'

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Aventura Fl
    Posts
    860

    Default Re: Outgoing CID

    Quote Originally Posted by Montano View Post
    I don't have any CID blocking on, and I'm calling from one voipo line to another which has always shown 'Fresno, CA'
    I just made a call from each of my 2 VOIPo lines to the other and my full name shows up on both.

    I am using my SPA2102, and in the setup for each line, there is a field to enter the name that you want displayed.
    When I get a minute, I will alter those names and see if anything changes..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Central Cali :)
    Posts
    553

    Default Re: Outgoing CID

    I believe that's how it should work with voipo to voipo calls. What shows up when you call a non-voipo line ?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,220

    Default Re: Outgoing CID

    Mine shows my full name VOIPo 734 to VOIPo 352.
    I just found out 352 calling 734 goes straight to voicemail and the line is not in use!
    (I block numbers, but 352* is white listed .... I think?)


    OK .... it was blocked
    352 shows up (now) as Wildwood FL

    The full name for 734 might be because P8 set it before I ported.
    (both are GS HT286)
    Last edited by usa2k; 10-28-2008 at 08:05 PM.


    Using VOIPo services since February 2007
    Beta Tested the VOIPo Reseller Plan.
    A happy VOIPo Residential Customer

    Using VoIP devices since 12-2002
    Companies I've tried
    iConnectHere|Vonage|BroadvoxDirect|Vonage|Packet8| VOIPo
    VOIPo is a keeper!


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Kitsap County, WA.
    Posts
    734

    Default Re: Outgoing CID

    Mine says US LEC/ STARNET to some people including my second Voipo line and Belfair Wa. to others such as Vonage customers...
    I Void Warranties.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    270

    Default Re: Outgoing CID

    putting on my thinking hat
    It'd be nice to have such a publicly accessible number for testing purposes
    my wish list:
    1. Intelligent Call Forwarding that detects the incoming call originated from the "forwarded" phone and rings the original destination instead
    2. Call History that makes use of CallerID/Custom CallerID+Location. Call History only shows Custom CallerId+Loc. No CNAM look up; Albeitly,it's a step in the right direction!
    3. Scheduled sim. ring with a twist (see wish #1)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    2,220

    Default Re: Outgoing CID

    Quote Originally Posted by voxabox View Post
    putting on my thinking hat
    It'd be nice to have such a publicly accessible number for testing purposes
    One that spells it back!

    If it were VOIPo, it could have a promo of "Welcome to VOIPo.com! first.
    That would be very popular on DSLR - could be in a FAQ.
    Last edited by usa2k; 10-29-2008 at 04:01 AM.


    Using VOIPo services since February 2007
    Beta Tested the VOIPo Reseller Plan.
    A happy VOIPo Residential Customer

    Using VoIP devices since 12-2002
    Companies I've tried
    iConnectHere|Vonage|BroadvoxDirect|Vonage|Packet8| VOIPo
    VOIPo is a keeper!


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Irvine CA
    Posts
    1,542,128,044

    Default Re: Outgoing CID

    At this point, Outbound CNAM is still not something we're officially offering. While a lot of areas have it, it's not something supported consistently across the board so our official stance on it is that it's not supported at all.

    There are several issues at play here.

    The name is not something we can just transmit out with calls. Only the actual CLEC/carrier that owns the DID blocks can update the name records. These updates go into central databases that companies do lookups from. Some upstream carriers that we use support it...some do not. Some do in limited areas. Overall, it's just not consistently supported.

    Level3 is our primary carrier. They sell two types of DIDs...ELS and LI. ELS supports Oubound CNAM, LI does not.

    ELS DIDs are substantially higher priced because they bundle in local calling, etc. We're talking going from basically free DIDs with usage charges of around 1/2 a cent to going to several dollars for the DID with inbound usage charges of around $0.01-$0.015. That is one issue to consider, but that's not the only issue here though.

    Their ELS DIDs require a service address to be on file for each DID. The big issue is that when you order an ELS DID from them, you simply send them an address and they respond back with available numbers in the ratecenter of the service address (typically via API), so if you provide an address in Denver, it'd only let you order a Denver number in the "proper" ratecenter for that address. You could later update the address to another service address, but ordering is initially locked to the proper one.

    LI DIDs are just ordered in bulk and Level3 doesn't collect any information like name or service address, so this is a non-issue with them.

    This is a problems since a lot of users don't get a DID in the ratecenter they live in. While we certainly were enterprising at ViaTalk in using Wal-Mart/Post Office addresses when the customer ordered a DID outside of their normal traditional ratecenter, that's not something I want to do now.

    Overall, LI DIDs are better for our big picture goals even though they don't support outbound CNAM.

    1) We Can Maintain Some Internal Inventory vs Relying Solely On API

    2) No Updating Service Addresses with Level3

    3) Virtual Numbers and Primary Numbers From Same Pool, Can Switch Them Back and Forth

    4) Ability to Recycle Numbers

    That's really the core of the issue. Now on top of that, many other carriers don't support it, so if we want to add other carriers to the mix we can.

    With all this being said, we are exploring the possibility of dropping Level3 entirely very soon and this issue will go away. One of the largest Level3 resellers (one of the top 3) just recently closed a large round of funding to acquire a CLEC and expand it in all major metros and move the bulk of their traffic off out Level3. We have an existing relationship and they approached us about working with them at least as a customer, but possible also as a co-investor partner since we have the ability to raise a lot of capital as well if desired.

    We've also discussed some options with Global Crossing and have considered moving there as well (they fully support it). You'll remember SunRocket for the longest time did not have the full Level3 footprint and was primarily Global Crossing and Paetec...this is likely one reason they held off on it so long.

    For those of you with Paetec/US LEC DIDs, they will eventually show your name. Paetec is willing to work with us on that, but it's a manual process on their end (and is for most) so it's literally a situation where if we provide them with a CSV file of names, they'll do it, but only a few times a year since it's literally a manual process.


    Some additional points:

    If your number is showing an incorrect name, we can always get this corrected.

    If you are porting in, your number should maintain its prior CNAM and Directory Listing status.

    If you have a DID without name showing and it is is a big issue for you and you want a NEW number in your home ratecenter and can provide a valid service address in it, we can issue you a new number with it. We cannot convert existing LI numbers though.
    Timothy Dick
    Founder/CEO
    VOIPo.com

    Interact with VOIPo: Twitter, Facebook

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •