Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: How I hooked up VOIPo

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Houston suburb
    Posts
    253

    Default Re: How I hooked up VOIPo

    Quote Originally Posted by ctaranto View Post
    If insecure and "more openly" is synonymous, then I don't want it. VOIPo only needs certain ports. It shouldn't be THAT open. I actually prefer having a PAP2T, which HAS to be behind a router (that's what I had with VoicePulse). I want to mimic the topology that I had, with my WRT first in line. I also like to measure bandwidth usage and with the RT first, I can't do that.
    I don't have this setup either, but it is preferred by Voipo. It must be secure enough, otherwise you'd be hearing of more ATA's being attacked or hacked.

    Quote Originally Posted by ctaranto View Post
    The WRT's DHCP pool is .100. The RT isn't getting it's IPs from the WRT (I put them in statically), so .2 and .3 were chosen. Because an IP is outside of the DHCP realm (but inside the subnet mask), that causes NAT to be used? I didn't believe that was the case. I believe the way I've hooked it up, the RT *IS* a switch now. The only thing is the WAN port needs to be used because all voice communications goes out the WAN. DHCP is turned off on the RT, and nothing else is connected to it. I can also directly log into the RT via 172.20.0.2 (without any port numbers) while wireless connected to the WRT.
    Ok, I stand corrected. I missed the fact you statically assigned the IP's on the RT with the same subnet.

    Router setup:
    IP: 172.20.0.1
    Subnet: 255.255.255.0
    Gateway: 0.0.0.0
    DHCP enabled: starting IP pool of 172.20.0.100

    RT LAN:
    IP: 172.20.0.2
    Subnet: 255.255.255.0
    Gateway: 172.20.0.1

    RT WAN:
    IP: 172.20.0.3
    Subnet: 255.255.255.0
    Gateway: 172.20.0.1

    LAN and WAN ports on the RT are set with static IP's which are on the same subnet as the router and do not automatically obtain IP's from the WRT. The RT is acting like a switch as you mentioned, so there's only a single NAT between your public IP and your RT which is good.

    I do see a problem as chpalmer pointed out in his post. Your WRT's gateway should be 172.20.0.1 not 0.0.0.0 It's possible when you had the RT's WAN hooked up to the WRT's LAN that the router assigned this gateway to the RT as well. I'm assuming of course that you had the RT automatically obtain its IP address from the WRT's IP pool when you tried it before. You might want to see if that was the problem. If this resolves the issue, then you would want to reserve or assign a static IP for the RT in the router.
    Last edited by tritch; 01-18-2010 at 12:41 PM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •